- Purpose of use
- Learning
- Comment/Request
- What's the accuracy given the true labels t and the predicted labels p

t = (1,3,2,4,3,2,1,4,3,2,3,4)

p = (1,2,2,4,4,2,1,4,1,2,3,4)

[1] 2019/08/29 15:43 Male / 20 years old level / Others / Useful /

- Purpose of use
- calculate numbers with high precision
- Comment/Request
- the calculator was much more accurate than most calculators

it included plenty of digits after 0

[2] 2019/08/26 06:45 Male / Under 20 years old / Elementary school/ Junior high-school student / Very /

- Purpose of use
- To try and get the sum (1/2)*130*((19+(4/9))^2) to give an answer as a fraction (as the CASIO physical calculators (which I lost mine) give a fractional answer)
- Comment/Request
- Please add an option of either recurring decimal or fraction for the answer.

[3] 2019/07/26 02:40 Male / Under 20 years old / High-school/ University/ Grad student / A little /

- Purpose of use
- needed to calculat 63421798*1111111111111

[4] 2019/07/10 10:13 Male / Under 20 years old / Elementary school/ Junior high-school student / Very /

- Purpose of use
- Large math
- Comment/Request
- Have it be able to insert the answer into the equation

[5] 2019/06/29 03:36 Female / Under 20 years old / High-school/ University/ Grad student / Very /

- Purpose of use
- Confirm results of extended data type being developed.
- Bug report
- I am getting different results when changing the # of digits of precision. For example, 4077 factorial (4077!) gives 8.805358403694188560826142895652149E+12950 with 34 digits of precision is selected but when I change the # of digits of precision to 30 the result is 8.80535840369418856082614289572E+12950 but I would expect it to be 8.80535840369418856082614289565E+12950 based on the result with 34 digits selected.

Could you please tell me which one is the most accurate (the 34 digit result or the 30 digit result)? BTW, I have also seen this happen when switching the # of digits between 34 and 30.

Also, it would be useful to be able to select the desired rounding at the least significant digit. For example, floor, ceiling or round (with midpoint (X.XXXXX5) round up or down).

Thank you in advance! - from Keisan
- 4077! = 8.8053584036941885608261428956521446690495134141499451373172861805330159......E+12950

If the accuracy checkbox is checked, the results are below.

8.8053584036941885608261428957E+12950 (30digit)

8.80535840369418856082614289565214E+12950 (34digit)

[6] 2019/06/18 01:26 Male / 60 years old level or over / An engineer / Very /

- Purpose of use
- ((1+sqrt(5))/2)^135

The powers of the golden ratio are nearly equal to integers (a so-called "PV number")

[7] 2019/06/11 15:25 Male / 50 years old level / A teacher / A researcher / Very /

- Purpose of use
- Find a numerical value to a high precision.

[8] 2019/06/11 06:23 Male / Under 20 years old / High-school/ University/ Grad student / Very /

- Purpose of use
- Gamma Function
- Comment/Request
- Have A Gamma Function and sq.

[9] 2019/05/24 01:00 Male / Under 20 years old / Elementary school/ Junior high-school student / A little /

- Purpose of use
- confirm a high precision division function

[10] 2019/05/19 04:08 Male / Under 20 years old / High-school/ University/ Grad student / Useful /

**The hyperlink to [Calculator]**